Judicial Dashboard is pitched as a tool for monitoring and comparing judges directly. It breaks down plaintiff and defendant outcomes by case type and keyword, looks at outcomes by gender and race, tracks case durations, and lists the lawyers and law firms who've appeared before a given judge. One stated feature is identifying performance outliers as a way of flagging favoritism.
The same brochure extends the comparison from judges to courts, covering volume by jurisdiction, differences in outcomes between jurisdictions, jurisdiction analysis by keyword, case duration, and broader trending data. A related feature named JusText is introduced toward the end, framed around putting a number to the soundness of a ruling — the idea being that measurable rulings make for surer justice, though the brochure's own explanation is cut short in the excerpt available here.
Together, the two angles — judge-level and court-level comparison — describe a product for lawyers and litigants who want a data-backed read on where a case is likely headed before it's filed.
